• Canon EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 IS SLR Lens

    Canon Digital EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 IS SLR Camera Lens

    From Canon

    List Price: $199.99
    Price: $139.99
    You Save: $60.00 (30%)



    Availability: Usually ships in 1-2 business days
    Ships from and sold by Gigabargain

    35 new or used available from $104.99

    Average customer review:

    Customer Digital SLR Lens Reviews

    5.0 out of 5 stars Great ef camera lens, especially for the very low price,* Very sharp across the image, even wide open.
    * Low Chroma. I read a test ([...]) that found higher than normal amounts of CA in this canon 55mm lens at some apertures, but I don’t see it. My standard test is to shoot bare tree limbs on bright sunny days & look for purple fringing, especially at the edges. I’m not seeing anywhere near the level of fringing shown in some of their test shots.If anything, I’d call it “low” I read elsewhere that one of Canon’s goals in adding the aspherical element to this ef-s 18-55mm lens was to reduce CA, so I’m thinking maybe the lens tested in photozon.de was just a bad apple.
    * Image Shake control works. I can’t attest to how often it provides a full 4 stops worth of shake reduction, but I can see a very clear result when using it.
    * Fast accurate focusing. One of the reasons I purchased this lens was because I was dissatisfied with the performance of my (more expensive) Sigma 17-35 EX (the newer model), which while sharp, is just too slow and inaccurate a focuser for close work in action sports. The new Canon solved that problem.
    * Compact, light weight & unobtrusive. Not much bigger than a normal lens.
    CONS
    * Barrel Distortion at 18mm (28mm) While not exsessive for an inexpensive lens, this is one area where you will see benefit from spending hundreds of dollars for a much more expensive Canon “IS” or “L,” or buying a fixed focal length lens. In most real world situations, it wasn’t all that noticeable. I could usually correct for it in Photoshop, but this is not a lens for critical architectural work etc. I have taken hundreds of photos with this lens and barrel distortion has only called attention to itself a few times. I suspect this is one price paid for the very compact design.
    * Not very fast. Another area where an “L” has an edge. At F3.5 28mm equivalent and F5.6 85mm this ef zoom lens is relatively slow compared to a pro lens. This effects stopping the action in low light. OTH, you will have to spend hundreds more to get a usable top speed of F 2.8 and that is *only* one stop faster at 28mm equiv. I think both this lens’ sharpness and the IS system mitigate this “Con.” It took me a while to learn that I could shoot wide open at all focal lengths without having the outer third of the image turn to mush.That’s pretty amazing for a zoom at this price. You don’t have a stop or two you almost never use because it is too soft. And the IS system works well in low light, though that doesn’t figure in in stopping the action.
    * Does not have that red stripe. Sad to say, some will never buy this sharp, handy little lens because in is not an “L” and/or doesn’t cost $[...]. Yes, it does does look a little “plasticy,” probably doesn’t have the build quality for heavy, everyday use by a real working pro, and does not look massive mounted on your camera body, like a “fast” pro lens that’s squeezing out that last F stop. But IMO, it looks very similar to Canon’s newer IS lenses, so there is no scarlet letter immediately identifying you as “cheap.” In other words, “Get over it.”

    So, why did Canon produce such a good lens at such a bargain price? I’d say that it’s because Nikon announced their intention to do the same a little while ago. Also, Canon’s old non IS 18-55mm lens had the rep of being something of a dog. Finally, several competing cameras now have IS built into the body. Canon had to respond with a sharp IS lens that they could put on the Rebels & the 40D. In terms of sales, the low end of the digital ef market is both hot and very competitive. We’re the beneficiaries.

    5.0 out of 5 stars Not a professional photographer,
    I know nothing about ISO, shutter speeds, Ring lag etc…I’m so not a professional Photographer far from it. I just set my Canon Rebel to Auto and push the button.

    But what I do know is I have a canon 55mm-250mm lens (which cost way More then the canon ef-s 18-55mm) and the 250mm is better at getting far far away shots. But not so great on up close birthday pictures and fast action baseball shots. Were the 18mm-55mm is!!

    I use my 18mm-55mm almost all the time. I only pull the 250mm lens out when I have to shot something really far away which isn’t often. I like that the 18mm-55mm is smaller and auto focus is faster compare to the 250mm lens.

    When I download my s 18-55mm ef lens pics of my son’s baseball game to his team web page and get emails asking me “who was the photographer that took those great pictures??” me a photographer!! That is all that needs to be said about this lens!!

    I don’t think it feels cheap and I don’t care if ISO are slow, etc.. that other reviews complain about. With my 18-55mm lens I get a prefect picture every time, I have never been Disappointed (with my 250mm I have been).

    I wonder if maybe some of the people who have trouble with this lens is because you need to leave the ISO and speed alone and just let the camera do all the work; try auto once and awhile. Because I have no problems with getting prefect pictures every time I use auto setting with this lens.

    Related :

    Tags: digital slr lens, digital SLR cameras, canon lens, tamron lens, nikon lens, sigma lens, slr lens

    Posted by @ 6:20 am

    Tags: , , , , , , ,

  • Leave a Comment

    Please note: Comment moderation is enabled and may delay your comment. There is no need to resubmit your comment.

Custom Search

Canon Lens Bestsellers

Nikon Lens BestSellers

Sigma Lens BestSellers


ShoutMix chat widget